his was discussed by the participants of the plenary session "Systemic Development of Information Security Regulatory Systems" at the conference on information security regulation issues of the Association of Users of Information Security Standards (ABISS), answering the question of the session moderator, chairperson of the ABISS association, head of the Aktiv.consulting company Anastasia Kharybina "Should some interdepartmental body (or procedure) appear that will deal with the development, coordination and harmonization of regulatory requirements?"
division of the Federal Security albania whatsapp number database Service (FSB) of Russia, there are enough departments and organizations involved in regulation in the country, and each has its own competence. He said that the FSB has no problem establishing direct contact with banks, the Federal Service for Technical and Export Control, or the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media to discuss regulation. And the creation of some third department to which requests would need to be sent is unnecessary. However, in his opinion, the legislation and regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation need changes and updates, which are happening, but not quickly.
"We see things that need to be cancelled or simplified so that people do things correctly. The work on updating is underway, but slowly," said Alexey Petrov.
Andrey Raevsky, an employee of the National Coordination Center for Computer Incidents (NCCI), agreed with him. In his opinion, the regulatory framework of the Russian Federation needs to be modernized and improved. He noted the need for its observance by both organizations and contractors, who can point out its weak points to regulators.
"I also do not support the creation of a chief of all chiefs," said the scientific editor of the Information Security of Business magazine, deputy head of the information security department at VTB PJSC. "But coordination and a clear delineation of powers between regulators are needed. I like the idea of simplifying regulation to make it more convenient for those being regulated. Perhaps some kind of body is possible here, but how to create it is a good question. In my opinion, our expert community is not sufficiently developed. There are expert associations in the Russian Federation, but they mostly play the role of lobbying organizations. I am for simplifying regulations, but I am also for the emergence of independent and objective expertise, which does not exist now. In my opinion, there should be societies and platforms where people will openly express their opinions. Then there would be fewer mistakes. Finally, I agree with the need to update the regulatory framework, since both the technical part and public relations are changing."
However, from the point of view of Dmitry Gusev, Depu
According to Alexey Petrov, head of the expert
-
- Posts: 563
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2025 7:15 am