To oppose a strong negotiator taiwan whatsapp in tough negotiations, you should understand that this is just a game that pursues a single goal. To counteract such tactics, you should gently but persistently offer to sort out the situation using the criteria clash method. It is important that the victim conducts the conversation not aggressively, but with confidence. This approach reduces the pressure of the aggressor and does not allow him to refer to the opponent's rude conduct of negotiations.
Ultimatum at the end of the conversation
This method of conducting business negotiations combines the two previous tactics. At first, the tough opponent participates in the conversation, bargains, etc. The negotiations proceed smoothly until the weaker party decides to express final agreement. At this point, the opponent starts working. He attacks: he says that the proposal is no longer relevant, uninteresting. The bet is made on the fact that, having relaxed, the victim will not be able to gather himself for confrontation, so he will accept the initial conditions that the opponent put forward at the start of the negotiation process.
Ultimatum at the end of the conversation
If you encounter this negotiation technology, you need to take into account the existence of strict prohibitions:
You can't take any statements personally or in relation to the proposal. If a tough negotiator has comments, he will make them known at the beginning of the meeting.
When participating in such business conversations, it is not advisable to stop them after the first refusal. In this situation, you should bargain.
You can't apologize.
There is no need to look for excuses.
Stand your ground.
You should not attack back or become aggressive.
Don't judge your opponent negatively. Don't stoop to his level.
Replace unpleasant and emotionally charged negative phrases with softer ones.
In the process of business negotiations related to the type under consideration, you can use a number of techniques that will allow you to change the situation to your advantage:
Use leading questions. Discuss each position put forward by the opponent.
Clarify the criteria. For example: "Did I understand correctly that...", "What else have we not discussed that is important to you?"
It is possible to expose the opponent using clarifying questions: “Do I understand you correctly: do you want to bargain with me?”, “It seems to me that our offer does not suit you. Please clarify in what way specifically?”