State Duma deputy Dmitry Kuznetsov, the author of the much-talked

[tanjimajuha20]

Sergey Matveyev drew attention to the example of Belarus, which has effectively nationalized all intellectual property of companies that have left the market, which is sold at fixed prices. However, such a move will only have a short-term effect, while such a measure will destroy national producers at the root. The adoption o australia cell phone number list f a similar measure in Russia would lead to the complete zeroing out of domestic players in the relevant market segments. So, when solving the immediate problems of cinemas, it is important not to harm the long-term interests of the industry. Plus, the efforts of 15 years spent on the formation of a civilized culture of consumption in the media and IT products market will be lost.

-about bill on compulsory licensing of intellectual property, said that his bill concerns primarily media products, not software. This measure is anti-sanction. As a result of the policies of the largest studios, as the parliamentarian noted, Russian cinema simply could not withstand competition even in its absence, and people stopped going to movie theaters. Piracy became the only salvation. The introduction of the bill was an attempt to tell the elite that someone should simply take responsibility. At the same time, according to him, piracy is still harmful, since it leads to the fact that Russian film production is deprived of the opportunity to develop. According to Dmitry Kuznetsov, some centralized body is needed that would determine what Hollywood products can be shown and what cannot. At the same time, the money collected works for our economy and ensures the operation of movie theaters. The copyright holder will also receive his share. This is the approach that has proven effective in France and China.