What might creative processes look like in the future?
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2025 10:28 am
This again shows the challenge of an AI in finding a balance between novelty and value. Moreover, in real creative processes there are usually no predefined outcomes that can be classified so easily. Although many works follow current trends and are based on audience preferences, there is no fully autonomous, quantitative way to measure the quality of a creative artifact. So here too, human intervention is required.
Another observation about artificial creativity that is obvious at first glance is that it produces creative artifacts from a rational rather than a creative intention. There are voices that claim that all works of art are expressions of human experiences and are created for human purposes only. This makes it clear why it is so difficult for an AI to create art on a human level.
Many of the limitations of creative AI that have been raised can be traced back to the question of how a machine can measure or evaluate creativity on its own. It has been found that human intervention is required at many points. Since AI systems are initialized by human programmers and work with algorithms programmed by humans, AI systems are always lithuania consumer email list at least to a small extent dependent on humans. It would be wrong to consider machine and human as unrelated concepts, and the question of whether machines can create art can in itself be considered misleading. Rather, the question that should be asked is what role AI plays in the creative process. On the one hand, a whole body of research seems to be devoted to the use of AI as autonomous generators that try to generate entire works of art with little user input. On the other hand, AI systems are also seen as creative tools that allow us to increase our own creativity. In this respect, AI is compared to a kind of improved brush for a painter. However, rather than focusing on either the reserved view of AI as a mere tool or the view of it as a generator in its own right, it should be recognized that the true strength of creative AI systems comes from partnership with humans.
Another observation about artificial creativity that is obvious at first glance is that it produces creative artifacts from a rational rather than a creative intention. There are voices that claim that all works of art are expressions of human experiences and are created for human purposes only. This makes it clear why it is so difficult for an AI to create art on a human level.
Many of the limitations of creative AI that have been raised can be traced back to the question of how a machine can measure or evaluate creativity on its own. It has been found that human intervention is required at many points. Since AI systems are initialized by human programmers and work with algorithms programmed by humans, AI systems are always lithuania consumer email list at least to a small extent dependent on humans. It would be wrong to consider machine and human as unrelated concepts, and the question of whether machines can create art can in itself be considered misleading. Rather, the question that should be asked is what role AI plays in the creative process. On the one hand, a whole body of research seems to be devoted to the use of AI as autonomous generators that try to generate entire works of art with little user input. On the other hand, AI systems are also seen as creative tools that allow us to increase our own creativity. In this respect, AI is compared to a kind of improved brush for a painter. However, rather than focusing on either the reserved view of AI as a mere tool or the view of it as a generator in its own right, it should be recognized that the true strength of creative AI systems comes from partnership with humans.