In the current situation, key vectors for development are becoming
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2025 8:57 am
e thing is that previously in each class of IT solutions there were one or two large manufacturers and therefore in how to build the infrastructure, a single-vendor approach was widespread: it was based on many products from one vendor that integrated well with each other. Now in some classes there are dozens of solutions from different vendors. For example, there are more than 70 operating systems in the software registry, and almost 40 virtualization platforms. From all this diversity, customers often find it difficult to choose a suitable solution that can integrate into their infrastructure and meet their needs.
If we talk about system switzerland whatsapp resource support, now it is impossible to simply implement a system and move on. Knowledge transfer, end-user training, and technical support are required. Moreover, the situation is such that due to the rush demand, vendors physically do not have enough for everyone. Teams are growing, but there are too many customers. Therefore, we are faced with a large number of cases when vendors transfer the first and second (L1, L2) technical support lines to us as IT partners. And L3 cases with really complex incidents that require revision, patches - this is already taken on by the vendor. In addition, the success of implementing large complex systems, such as ERP systems, directly depends on the integrator and their level of competence. After all, each large customer has complex business processes, so the main burden falls on the integrator.
Compatibility test
obvious to large software and hardware manufacturers.
The first is the creation of ready-made ecosystems from software products compatible with each other. Finding yourself in a situation where you need to follow the path of several global players (IBM, Microsoft, Oracle) in a short time, it is important to clearly understand how these vendors worked and what customers wanted from their products. Therefore, in the last few years, large software suppliers such as the Astra Group and Orion soft have been assembling their own multi-component ecosystems and gradually filling the niches of companies that left Russia.
The second is to increase the level of compatibility between solutions from different manufacturers. So that, for example, a software update from one manufacturer does not lead to failures in another software product that is used in the same information system. And this applies not only to software solutions, but also to hardware. Requests for software and hardware complexes are growing exponentially year after year, and now the market already knows PACs from companies such as Aquarius, Skala^r, etc.
Those who succeed in these areas gain a significant competitive advantage. We are now seeing a global trend towards an increase in the number of technology partnerships and a general consolidation of Russian manufacturers for the sake of joint development of the IT industry.
Crossing systems
If we talk about system switzerland whatsapp resource support, now it is impossible to simply implement a system and move on. Knowledge transfer, end-user training, and technical support are required. Moreover, the situation is such that due to the rush demand, vendors physically do not have enough for everyone. Teams are growing, but there are too many customers. Therefore, we are faced with a large number of cases when vendors transfer the first and second (L1, L2) technical support lines to us as IT partners. And L3 cases with really complex incidents that require revision, patches - this is already taken on by the vendor. In addition, the success of implementing large complex systems, such as ERP systems, directly depends on the integrator and their level of competence. After all, each large customer has complex business processes, so the main burden falls on the integrator.
Compatibility test
obvious to large software and hardware manufacturers.
The first is the creation of ready-made ecosystems from software products compatible with each other. Finding yourself in a situation where you need to follow the path of several global players (IBM, Microsoft, Oracle) in a short time, it is important to clearly understand how these vendors worked and what customers wanted from their products. Therefore, in the last few years, large software suppliers such as the Astra Group and Orion soft have been assembling their own multi-component ecosystems and gradually filling the niches of companies that left Russia.
The second is to increase the level of compatibility between solutions from different manufacturers. So that, for example, a software update from one manufacturer does not lead to failures in another software product that is used in the same information system. And this applies not only to software solutions, but also to hardware. Requests for software and hardware complexes are growing exponentially year after year, and now the market already knows PACs from companies such as Aquarius, Skala^r, etc.
Those who succeed in these areas gain a significant competitive advantage. We are now seeing a global trend towards an increase in the number of technology partnerships and a general consolidation of Russian manufacturers for the sake of joint development of the IT industry.
Crossing systems