Which index reports the highest backlink count for a randomly selected domain?
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 8:42 am
This metric was not kind to me, as I initially found a terrible mistake. (For other techies reading this, I was storing the backlink count as INT(11) instead of BIGINT, which caused a lot of relationships for large domains when they were larger than the maximum number size because the database defaults to that highest number.)Yet, Majestic has been stealing the show on this metric for some time now, it's much deeper than the story. Their dominance is such that it needs explaining.
One of the most difficult decisions a company has to bahrain number data make regarding its backlink index is how to handle spam. On the one hand, spam is expensive to index and Google probably ignores it. On the other hand, it’s important for users to know if they’re getting too many spammy links. I don’t think there’s a right answer to this question. Each index simply has to make a choice. A closer look at the reason Majestic is winning (and continuing to increase its advantage) is a particularly insidious Wikipedia clone spam network. Any site with any backlinks from Wikipedia is getting a lot of links from this network, which is why their backlink count is growing exponentially. If you’re worried about these types of links, you need to take a look at Majestic and look for links that end primarily in .space or .pro, including sites like tennis-fdfdbc09.pro, troll-warlord-64fa73ba.pro, and badminton-026a50d5.space. According to my last tests, Majestic’s index contains over 16,000 such domains in this spam network . Majestic is winning this metric, but for purposes other than finding spam networks, it may not be the right choice.
Linking root domains per domain
Which index reports the highest LRD count for a randomly selected domain?
One of the most difficult decisions a company has to bahrain number data make regarding its backlink index is how to handle spam. On the one hand, spam is expensive to index and Google probably ignores it. On the other hand, it’s important for users to know if they’re getting too many spammy links. I don’t think there’s a right answer to this question. Each index simply has to make a choice. A closer look at the reason Majestic is winning (and continuing to increase its advantage) is a particularly insidious Wikipedia clone spam network. Any site with any backlinks from Wikipedia is getting a lot of links from this network, which is why their backlink count is growing exponentially. If you’re worried about these types of links, you need to take a look at Majestic and look for links that end primarily in .space or .pro, including sites like tennis-fdfdbc09.pro, troll-warlord-64fa73ba.pro, and badminton-026a50d5.space. According to my last tests, Majestic’s index contains over 16,000 such domains in this spam network . Majestic is winning this metric, but for purposes other than finding spam networks, it may not be the right choice.
Linking root domains per domain
Which index reports the highest LRD count for a randomly selected domain?